| Pages: [1] |
1. Loki PVE setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Gyrostabilizer II x2 Tracking Enhancer II Shield power relay II 10MN Afterburner II LSE II x2 Tech II rat specific hardners x2 425mm AutoCannon II x6 Expanded probe laucher Medium core field purger I x3 Loki Defensive - Adaptive shielding Lo...
- by Badger Beard - at 2011.09.20 18:37:00
|
2. Linking bomber and DDD use to sov held - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Well it seems to me that it isn't such a good idea after all. Even if CCP managed to perfectly balance ships there doesn't seem to a way to stop the largests alliances dominating without CCP interferring which I don't think they would want to do...
- by Badger Beard - at 2011.09.16 14:46:00
|
3. Linking bomber and DDD use to sov held - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I agree with you that the system favours the people with the most space but isn't that the problem at the moment? Those with most space and resources are free to build and use as many SC and titans as they can. This effectivley means that smaller ...
- by Badger Beard - at 2011.09.16 08:47:00
|
4. Linking bomber and DDD use to sov held - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
My idea is that SC and titans will normally be unable to use bombers and DDD unless the pilot is part of an alliance that holds a certain amount of sov (i.e. systems with TCUs in). For SC i was thinking an alliance could enable 1 pilot per system ...
- by Badger Beard - at 2011.09.16 07:05:00
|
5. Ship Balancing: Dramiel! (and Logistics) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Will the changes to the ships be first trialled on Sisi (so we have a chance to get first hand experience of the changes, offer better feedback and perhaps allow the opportunity for fine tuning) before they are applied to Tranq?
- by Badger Beard - at 2011.08.04 21:56:00
|
6. [Proposal] T2 Close Range Turret Ammo sucks. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Badger Beard on 16/04/2010 12:43:44 Perhaps tech 2 needs more specialisation for its usage with a clear application. Type 1- Higher DPS with ship signature and/or tracking penalties for applying more dps to larger and slower target...
- by Badger Beard - at 2010.04.16 12:42:00
|
7. Neural re-map skill - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Badger Beard on 27/01/2010 17:22:50 Edited by: Badger Beard on 27/01/2010 17:21:44 Yes i recognise that this may affect peoples view on learning may be affected but I'm sure there is a way to alter that by the skill rank and cos...
- by Badger Beard - at 2010.01.27 17:20:00
|
8. Neural re-map skill - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The neural remaping ability is a real bonus to eve but a year between remaps seems to be an excessively long time especially if people suddenly want to take a change in direction (guess this arguement applies to people who only have and want one t...
- by Badger Beard - at 2010.01.26 17:37:00
|
9. New Ship Idea - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I think the Flagship idea would be better incorperated into the black op ships (which would therfore lead covert op fleets into cyno jammed systems) and sacrifice their turrets in order to fit the command modules. I would then have the tech 2 var...
- by Badger Beard - at 2009.12.18 14:38:00
|
10. [Proposal] - Minmatar Large Projectile/Ship Fix - Astrophobic's - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Sounds good
- by Badger Beard - at 2009.09.10 10:32:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |